leatha love doll Relevant Information
(48 People Likes) Is Chucky (Child's Play) a real doll? And which company made that doll for the movie?
’s Play movie featuring the doll character “Chucky” came out in 1988. (My Buddy (doll) - Wikipedia ). Here is a photo of the real doll from 1985: Here is a photo of Chucky, as the fictional “Good Guy” doll, before his appearance turns “evil.”: One can see the general resemblance to the 1985 doll design. The real-life Hasbro/Playskool “My Buddy” leatha love doll doll was, like the movie doll line, designed as a playmate, with little boys as the intended target market. In 2016, Mezco Toyz produced an officially licensed Chucky doll based on the movie character. Note that
(63 People Likes) Is it true that a sex doll tester gets £35k a year?
ITIES You will be responsible for the following: Quality control of all products arriving and leaving our warehouse to be sent to you for testing Liaising with manufacturers to improve our current product range and quality of products Attending industry events, worldwide in order to keep our product offering up to date and ahead of the competition Testing of new products ranges - this involves using the product Give detailed feedback to the manufacturers based on your testing of the products Product launches in collaboration with our marketing team Liaising with the sales team (Affiliates included) You will be working in a fun but fast working environment, helping to grow and improve our current product offering. The role offers flexible working times, depending on seasonal demands and new product releases. We are looking for an open minded individual, who is willing to get to the know products very well! A passion for sex dolls - any personal previous experience with them will be taken into consideration Strong eye for detail Can work to tight deadlines Willing to travel Highly driven individual WHAT WE ARE OFFERING 22 days holiday + bank holidays per year Discounted products to family and friends Worldwide travel to events Other perks such as free gym membership, company mobile etc Salary of up to £35,000 depending on experience We anticipate a high volume of applications for the role, in which case we will not be able to get back to everyone. We will be looking to shortlist potential candidates. If you have not heard from us after this time, unfortunately you have not been successful. Apply now as there is limited available spac
(11 People Likes) Which countries cannot be delivered for sex dolls?
I’m aware that there’s a social stigma surrounding toys like this. But I figure if women can buy dildos, what’s the problem with me buying a “friend”? It’s not as if I’m going to sit next to her at the dinner table and pretend she’s my wife or anything. Not unless she magically springs to life! No, I think it would be good for me to buy one of these things. It’s not ideal, obviously. But I’m not really in a position where getting “out there” and picking up women in bars is really a realistic option anymore. Nor have I ever been interested in meeting people in such places. And the “nice” women I like, are more or less long since married and settled, so i figure: why the Mini Sex Doll ell not? Simulated sex is better than nothing, right? And if I dim the lights, light a few candles and put on Greatest Love Hits by Richard Clayderman, I think I can even convince myself that I’m having a genuinely intimate moment with an extremely shy person. It’s only afterwards when you remove parts of her anatomy and clean them in the kitchen sink that reality seeps back in… But never mind reality! I may be totally wrong about all of this, but I’ve a feeling that buying a doll could perhaps make me feel less alone. It’s not real company, but if you pay enough cash, it can LOOK like real company. And for me, that’s a start. How many men own a Fleshlight? Millions, probably. Well, this is just a life-size
(17 People Likes) Why is importing or possessing a child sex doll a crime, for example in the UK and many states in the US?
’m going to establish some facts and personal background before actually answering it. I am a victim of childhood abuse, both by confirmed pedophiles and abusers who ab leatha love doll se children. I’ve written about this extensively and some of the writing is in my profile. I am not a pedophile or anyone who has or would ever sexually abuse children. Pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is something that some people are, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It isn’t something someone chooses to be, it can’t be conditioned into them or out of them. It’s very likely, given what we know, that some people are simply born pedophiles and there is nothing to be done about that. Most sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims. Now that we have that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here. The problem with our society presently when it comes to pedophiles is that we simply demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is obviously a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t help their attraction is completely ignored and we lump people who are pedophiles but don’t actually act on it in any way (including in viewing child pornography) in with those that do. Because of that stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on it and what research there is heavily depends on offending pedophiles as subjects. Pedophiles who don’t offend rarely take part in studies because of the stigma around being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size. As a society when it comes to dealing with pedophiles, the goal is and should be simply the reduction of harm to children. In other words, the goal should be whatever it takes so that less children are abused. If you look at it from that perspective, the answer when it comes to sex dolls that look like prepubescent children, is that if in the end it reduces harm to actual children, we should allow them. As for whether or not they actually reduce harm to children, we simply don’t have enough data to say one way or the other. Evidence seems to suggest that it does make a pedophile less likely to offend if they have access to some kind of way to relieve themselves sexually like with a doll. There isn’t any evidence to suggest any kind of escalation of activity like using a doll would make someone more likely to abuse children. Similar to how massive amounts of evidence shows that people who play violent video games are actually less likely to be violent in real life and as porn use goes up people are less likely to commit sexual assault, we can extrapolate that people are less likely to act on their urges with a real child if they have some kind of ethical outlet. Th Sex Doll Torso main way the pedophiles who do offend actually end up offending is by viewing and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is wrong as well because you need to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn't abuse children would make all of those pedophiles that fall into the trap of child pornography less likely to actually do that. This leads us to the logical conclusion as well, where if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would that be allowed as well? As animation gets better, this might someday be possible. These are thorny ethical issues that must be addressed. The thing is, personally it bothers me and disgusts me. The idea of someone using a sex doll that looks like a child and watching animated porn of people having sex with children Is repulsive (and personally triggering to me). However, we have to remember that we have a goal in mind here and that goal is: fewer children molested and harmed. So if something that bothers and disgusts us but doesn't hurt any children will make it so that less actual children are harmed, I’m all for it. So in terms of whether or not they should be illegal I am leaning towards no. They should be allowed and we should do more scientific studies to make sure they actually do what we hope they do: make pedophiles less likely to offend. I would probably be in favor of them being prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that, who would monitor the person using them and make sure they weren’t going to hurt a real child. However, this is outside of my wheelhouse. Do they encourage and normalize a cultural climate that condones child molestation and pedophila? Why or why not? It would in no way create something that condones child molestation. There is no slippery slope here. This has been brought up in countless other industries. Do movies and games that show violence condone real violence? All evidence points to no. In fact, healthy humans are able to separate fantasy from reality and that’s why we are able to enjoy fantastical things that we would never condone in reality. There is strong evidence to suggest that having these fantasies prevents people from doing immoral things in real life. This is why rape fantasies are okay, but real rape isn’t. It goes on and on. As far as normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it in that we need to recognize that pedophilia or people who are pedophiles are normal and that they exist. We need to normalize their sexuality and help them not act on it. This is very important. Normalizing sexual abuse of children is not something we should ever do (and again, no evidence to suggest that child sex dolls do that). Normalizing pedophiles acknowledging their attractions and getting help to prevent them from hurting children is something we need to do. Summary: As someone who has been sexually abused as a child, I am willing to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. If that means sanctioning and providing child s
(57 People Likes) Should parents not give children any money?
and held onto the quarter as if it were something precious. We walked to the corner and went inside. I picked up a pack of Juicyfruit gum. I held out my quarter. The clerk behind the counter took it and gave me two dimes in change (gum was 5 cents a pack back then). I received more coins than I gave -- and I got a pack of gum! I can still remember how sweet it was to chew my very own stick of gum, that I bought with my very own money. This was my first experience with money that was entirely my own. I understood from that first transaction that money was a means of exchange. I understood (after it was explained to me) that more coin doesn't mean anything because twenty cents (two dimes) had less value than a twenty-five cent quarter. I was five years old and I understood that. I also understood, from that first transaction, that if I wanted to buy what I wanted -- instead of what other people wanted to give me -- I would have to save so I would have money of my own. This was important to me because people kept giving me dolls and I wanted an Erector Set. Knowing that Daddy and Mommy worked to earn money, and that I could work and earn 5 cents an hour sorting paperclips (I actually asked them what work a kid could do!) gave me incentive to sort thousands of paperclips. This kept me very busy while my parents cared for my younger siblings. And I felt rich! I saved all my coins for about five years and never bought a thing more expensive than a pack of gum. When the price of gum went up to ten cents a pack, I quit gum. It was my first act of consumer protest. Parents can and should teach children about money, work, and finance at a very young age. Before giving any money, teach the value of coins as soon as a child is able to count with 1:1 correlation to 100, so that there is number sense. Once all of the above are known to a child (numeracy, counting, and the face value of each coin and how to count money), then it is time to establish an allowance. Some parents choose to make chores (work) the focus of earning an allowance so children don't feel money is their right. I don't subscribe to paying children for chores because I want them to know that our home is nice because we all make it that way, together. Nobody was ever paid for housework in my family. We all contributed value to each other and where we live because that's what we do as a family. Instead, during the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, we gave our children an allowance determined by their weekly expenses at school and in life, and we paid our children extra money in addition to their allowance for doing something we would have to pay someone else to do. If they ran out of money we didn't give them more. They very quickly learned to budget and plan for their own expenses. When they had an expense beyond the allowance alotted, we discussed the expenditure. Was it something that should have been saved-for, in their 'rainy day fund?' If so, we did not pay for it. If it was something education-related, we always paid for it. When we could afford them, books and communication media were and are given whenever a child wants and/or needs it, in my world. Work included real jobs: manually removing snails from plants outside for 5 cents apiece (inflation!) when they were very young, setting up computers, creating letterhead, and brushing my long, wild hair. They soon learned which jobs paid the most! Now they are financially sav