my sweet love baby doll and accessories Relevant Information

(90 People Likes) Why do conservative men complain about liberal women not wanting to date them? They claim that conservative women are prettier and that liberal women are fat, ugly and repulsive.

In this present environment, there is heightened hostility to men deemed conservative, especially ones who would openly fly the Trump flag. That’s going to be just about the #1 deal-breaker to a typical liberal woman (can’t say I don’t understand why).
If we assume that only 70% of the eligible men in DC are liberal, that creates a pretty big disparity on the dating scene. If political differences become a deal-breaker, that becomes three conservative guys chasing every conservative girl. Not the greatest odds. It would seem like the well-adjusted, attractive conservative women would be snatched up pretty quick in that type of environment.
Basically, these Trump guys have sacrificed their dating life in pursuance of career ambitions. They would probably have much better luck back in the home district.
But generally, whenever anyone is put into the situation where they’re going to be rejected romantically by practically anyone, before they can even get their foot in the door, they are going to get frustrated.
Finally, Real Doll I didn’t see anything in this article about conservative men claiming that liberal women are ugly or whatever. That’s the kind of shit that gets mostly thrown around in alt-right/MRA forums by (mainly) guys who would have trouble getting with chicks of any political persuasion.
p.s. I’ve been watching The Wire lately (extremely minor spoiler ahead).
I just saw the scene last night where McNulty is on a date in DC, circa late 2004, and shrugs his shoulders and was like, “I didn’t vote, what’s t

(79 People Likes) What would be the best ideal place for complete privacy if one wants a sex doll?

I’m aware that there’s a social stigma surrounding toys like this. But I figure if women can buy dildos, what’s the problem with me buying a “friend”? It’s not as if I’m going to sit next to her at the dinner table and pretend she’s my wife or anything. Not unless she magically springs to life!
No, I think it would be good for me to buy one of these things. It’s not ideal, obviously. But I’m not really in a position where getting “out there” and picking up women in bars is really a realistic option anymore. Nor have I ever been interested in meeting people in such places. And the “nice” women I like, are more or less long since married and settled, so i figure: why the hell not?
Simulated sex is better than nothing, right? And if I dim the lights, light a few candles and put on Greatest Love Hits by Richard Clayderman, I think I can even convince myself that I’m having a genuinely intimate moment with an extremely shy person.
It’s only afterwards when you remove parts of her anatomy and clean them in the kitchen sink that reality seeps back in…
But never mind reality! I may be totally wrong about all of this, but I’ve a feeling that buying a doll could perhaps make me feel less alone. It’s not real company, but if you pay enough cash, it can LOOK like real company. And for me, that’s a start.
How many men own a Fleshlight? Millions, probably. Well, this is just a life-size

(46 People Likes) Why so many technology companies are manufacturing sex dolls? Aren't they promoting rape among users?

’m going to establish some facts and personal background before actually answering it.
I am a victim of childhood abuse, both by confirmed pedophiles and abusers who abuse children. I’ve written about this extensively and some of the writing is in my profile. I am not a pedophile or anyone who has or would ever sexually abuse children.
Pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is something that some people are, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It isn’t something someone chooses to be, it can’t be conditioned into them or out of them. It’s very likely, given what we know, that some people are simply born pedophiles and there is nothing to be done about that.
Most sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims.
Now that we have that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here.
The problem with our society presently when itcomes to pedophiles is that we simply demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is obviously a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t help their attraction is completely ignored and we lump people who are pedophiles but don’t actually act on it in any way (including in viewing child pornography) in with those that do. Because of that stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on it and what research there is heavily depends on offending pedophiles as subjects. Pedophiles who don’t offend rarely take part in studies because of the stigma around being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size.
As a society when itcomes to dealing with pedophiles, the goal is and should be simply the reduction of harm to children. In other words, the goal should be whatever it takes so that less children are abused. If you look at it from that perspective, the answer when itcomes to sex dolls that look like prepubescent children, is that if in the end it reduces harm to actual children, we should allow them.
As for whether or not they actually reduce harm to children, we simply don’t have enough data to say one way or the other. Evidence seems to suggest that it does make a pedophile less likely to offend if they have access to some kind of way to relieve themselves sexually like with a doll. There isn’t any evidence to suggest any kind of escalation of activity like using a doll would make someone more likely to abuse children. Similar to how massive amounts of evidence shows that people who play violent video games are actually less likely to be violent in real life and as porn use goes up people are less likely to commit sexual assault, we can extrapolate that people are less likely to act on their urges with a real child if they have some kind of ethical outlet.
The main way the pedophiles who do offend actually end up offending is by viewing and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is wrong as well because you need to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn't abuse children would make all of those pedophiles that fall into the trap of child pornography less likely to actually do that. This leads us to the logical conclusion as well, where if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would that be allowed as well? As animation gets better, this might someday be possible. These are thorny ethical issues that must be addressed.
The thing is, personally it bothers me and disgusts me. The idea of someone using a sex doll that looks like a child and watching animated porn of people having sex with children Is repulsive (and personally triggering to me). However, we have to remember that we have a goal in mind here and that goal is: fewer children molested and harmed. So if something that bothers and disgusts us but doesn't hurt any children will make it so that less actual children are harmed, I’m all for it.
So in terms of whether or not they should be illegal I am leaning towards no. They should be allowed and we should do more scientific studies to make sure they actually do what we hope they do: make pedophiles less likely to offend. I would probably be in favor of them being prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that, who would monitor the person using them and make sure they weren’t going to hurt a real child. However, this is outside of my wheelhouse.
Do they encourage and normalize a cultural climate that condones child molestation and pedophila? Why or why not?
It would in no way create something that condones child molestation. There is no slippery slope here. This has been brought up in countless other industries. Do movies and games that show violence condone real violence? All evidence points to no. In fact, healthy humans are able to separate fantasy from reality and that’s why we are able to enjoy fantastical things that we would never condone in reality. There is strong evidence to suggest that having these fantasies prevents people from doing immoral things in real life. This is why rape fantasies are okay, but real rape isn’t. It goes on and on.
As far as normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it in that we need to recognize that pedophilia or people who are pedophiles are normal and that they exist. We need to normalize their sexuality and help them not act on it. This is very important. Normalizing sexual abuse of children is not something we should ever do (and again, no evidence to suggest that child sex dolls do that). Normalizing pedophiles acknowledging their attractions and getting help to prevent them from hurting children is something we need to do.
Summary: As someone who has been sexually abused as a child, I am willing to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. If that means sanctioning and providing child s

(33 People Likes) What is the meaning of the sex doll?

s one of sex toys, for people, sex doll not just sex my sweet love baby doll and accessories toy, always the sex doll is their lover, soulma

(89 People Likes) People insult me for falling in love with a love (sex) doll. I don't just use her for sex though. I cuddle with her when I sleep and just watch TV or movies with her. Should I do what my co-workers say and get mentally evaluated?

a good idea. No, it does not sound mentally typical or normal, so I would see a Psychologist, and be very honest. If its not deterring your level of functioning, or hurting another, it may be fine for you. However, it wouldn't be a bad idea to explore any possible reasons that you have this desire for a doll, just to be sure that it isn't connected to an issue that may be or become a problem for