X

152cm real love and sex doll Relevant Information

(64 People Likes) Is Annabelle a doll in real life?

tually the Warrens built a locked case for Annabelle, and she resides there to this day. The locked case seems to have kept the doll from moving around, but it seems like that whatever terrible entity is attached to it is still there, waiting. Biding its time. Ready for the day when it can again be fr 152cm real love and sex doll e.
Also, Annabelle 3 has been officially titled, “Nightmare at the Museum” in

(40 People Likes) How does masturbating harm yourself?

e of all manner of physical and psychiatric conditions.
It was very widely thought to be a direct cause of various sorts of insanity.
People went to obscene lengths to prevent children from masturbating, even fitting beds with specially-designed restraints to prevent "access".
Much of this may stem from various religious notions that the practice is sinful, which in turn stems from very ancient beliefs that men in particular only had so much "seed" per lifetime and that one should not "waste" this....
One of the conditions attributed to masturbation was "neurasthenia".... Supposedly a type of overall lassitude and lack of vigor.
We know today that these sorts of conditions are from other things entirely, lik

(100 People Likes) What religion has been the most damaging in all of existence?

asy that uses our instincts against us and resists being analyzed as a means of survival. To put it another way, the “God” fantasy can only exist in a human head, and survives there only by pretending to be a “cure-all” for whatever hurts the host. For instance, for the slave it promises something better is coming “after death.” Or conversely, the fantasy can tell a business tycoon that he has “special rights” to being excessively wealthy. Because it masks as a solution to a problem, it can link itself into your brain’s reward center the same way that a sex fantasy does. And just as there are people who get more from their inflatable dolls and vibrators than from intercourse, there are people who get more from religion than from reality.
There are many examples. Charity is aid given to make up for a problem that a society can’t or won’t solve. As such, it represents a failing of society, and it’s never quite as beneficial as it would be if the society as a whole took care of the problem; it is the difference between giving charitable aid to flood victims versus preventing the flood in the first place. Many people pretend that they are helping their neighbors by giving to religious charities instead of changing the society.
I’ve only touched the tip of the iceberg. When a religion has weak competitors with no political influence, it evolves intolerance. This has happened repeatedly throughout history. In Roman times, when the state religion was Classical Polytheism and emperors were to be worshiped like gods, certain emperors would sporadically persecute Christianity — until they noticed how many people wanted to be martyrs. The tables soon turned. When Christianity became Rome’s state religion and the Emperor believed he got his powers from God, there slowly began a relentless persecution of “pagans” that has never quite stopped. It was taken up by all of the Christian successor states to the empire. Worse yet, the Muslim empire set up by the Arabs copied the Romans. Today, there are only a few Classical Polytheists left, and they may all be converts from other religions. Similarly there are religious minorities in Muslim countries, but they tend to be Christians which get special tolerance in Islam.
The strangest case of all is Communism. Like some forms of Buddhism, Confucianism and even Hinduism, it has atheism as one of its beliefs. However it too has an enthralling fantasy; the “workers’ paradise” which is supposed to be the end result of “the revolution.” And in all other ways, it acts like a religion. Enhanced by modern technology, Communism killed millions of victims during the Twentieth Century. It may even have killed as many people as Christianity, Islam and Buddhism killed in the last two thousand years.
The problem with all I have said is that the religious fantasies most believers hold pretend that their particular religion is someh

(26 People Likes) Why so many technology companies are manufacturing sex dolls? Aren't they promoting rape among users?

’m going to establish some facts and personal background before actually answering it.
I am a victim of childhood abuse, both by confirmed pedophiles and abusers who abuse children. I’ve written about this extensively and some of the writing is in my profile. I am not a pedophile or anyone who has or would ever sexually abuse children.
Pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is something that some people are, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It isn’t something someone chooses to be, it can’t be conditioned into them or out of them. It’s very likely, given what we know, that some people are simply born pedophiles and there is nothing to be done about that.
Most sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims.
Now that we have that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here.
The problem with our society presently when it comes to pedophiles is that we simply demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is obviously a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t help their attraction is completely ignored and we lump people who are pedophiles but don’t actually act on it in any way (including in viewing child pornography) in with those that do. Because of that stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on it and what research there is heavily depends on offending pedophiles as subjects. Pedophiles who don’t offend rarely take part in studies because of the stigma around being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size.
As a society when it comes to dealing with pedophiles, the goal is and should be simply the reduction of harm to children. In other words, the goal should be whatever it takes so that less children are abused. If you look at it from that perspective, the answer when it comes to sex dolls that look like prepubescent children, is that if in the end it reduces harm to actual children, we should allow them.
As for whether or not they actually reduce harm to children, we simply don’t have enough data to say one way or the other. Evidence seems to suggest that it does make a pedophile less likely to offend if they have access to some kind of way to relieve themselves sexually like with a doll. There isn’t any evidence to suggest any kind of escalation of activity like using a doll would make someone more likely to abuse children. Similar to how massive amounts of evidence shows that people who play violent video games are actually less likely to be violent in real life and as porn use goes up people are less likely to commit sexual assault, we can extrapolate that people are less likely to act on their urges with a real child if they have some kind of ethical outlet.
The main way the pedophiles who do offend actually end up offending is by viewing and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is wrong as well because you need to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn't abuse children would make all of those pedophiles that fall into the trap of child pornography less likely to actually do that. This leads us to the logical conclusion as well, where if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would that be allowed as well? As animation gets better, this might someday be possible. These are thorny ethical issues that must be addressed.
The thing is, personally it bothers me and disgusts me. The idea of someone using a sex doll that looks like a child and watching animated porn of people having sex with children Is repulsive (and personally triggering to me). However, we have to remember that we have a goal in mind here and that goal is: fewer children molested and harmed. So if something that bothers and disgusts us but doesn't hurt any children will make it so that less actual children are harmed, I’m all for it.
So in terms of whether or not they should be illegal I am leaning towards no. They should be allowed and we should do more scientific studies to make sure they actually do what we hope they do: make pedophiles less likely to offend. I would probably be in favor of them being prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that, who would monitor the person using them and make sure they weren’t going to hurt a real child. However, this is outside of my wheelhouse.
Do they encourage and normalize a cultural climate that condones child molestation and pedophila? Why or why not?
It would in no way create something that condones child molestation. There is no slippery slope here. This has been brought up in countless other industries. Do movies and games that show violence condone real violence? All evidence points to no. In fact, healthy humans are able to separate fantasy from reality and that’s why we are able to enjoy fantastical things that we would never condone in reality. There is strong evidence to suggest that having these fantasies prevents people from doing immoral things in real life. This is why rape fantasies are okay, but real rape isn’t. It goes on and on.
As far as normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it in that we need to recognize that pedophilia or people who are pedophiles are normal and that they exist. We need to normalize their sexuality and help them not act on it. This is very important. Normalizing sexual abuse of children is not something we should ever do (and again, no evidence to suggest that child sex dolls do that). Normalizing pedophiles acknowledging their attractions and getting help to prevent them from hurting children is something we need to do.
Summary: As someone who has been sexually abused as a child, I am willing to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. If that means sanctioning and providing child s

(56 People Likes) What would be an appropriate gift? My ex-husband is marrying his fiance over Thanksgiving break, and I would like to get them something small but nice. Our kids will be at the ceremony, and I'd like them to be able to give them something.

ommend you for your ability to get past the past, so to speak. You have a level of maturity far above that of so many divorced parents.
This may seem off the wall, but since the kids are going to the wedding, I am going to assume they are on good te Love Doll ms with their dad's choice. What if each kid chose a game (nonelectronic), and in the card, say something about new traditions and suggesting a game ni

Copyright © 2016-2022 ELOVEDOLLS.COM All Rights Reserved. Sitemap