people having sex with blow up dolls Relevant Information
(66 People Likes) Can I bring my silicon doll (naughty purpose) through checked baggage?
but do the most damage. The arms that move the bags has to move a 70 lb bag from one baggage belt to anothe people having sex with blow up dolls . You can imagine hard hard that arm hits and moves a 20 pound bag. There can be a lot of damage done. People buy cheap bags. Another problem. Good bags are very expensive but are worth it in the long run. Also bags are suppose to protect the
(34 People Likes) Should sex dolls that look like kids be illegal? Are they?
’m going to establish some facts and personal background before actually answering it. I am a victim of childhood abuse, both by confirmed pedophiles and abusers who abuse children. I’ve written about this extensively and some of the writing is in my profile. I am not a pedophile or anyone who has or would ever sexually abuse children. Pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is something that some people are, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It isn’t something someone chooses to be, it can’t be conditioned into them or out of them. It’s very likely, given what we know, that some people are simply born pedophiles and there is nothing to be done about that. Most sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims. Now that we have that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here. The problem with our society presently when it comes to pedophiles is that we simply demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is obviously a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t help their attraction is completely ignored and we lump people who are pedophiles but don’t actually act on it in any way (including in viewing child pornography) in with those that do. Because of that stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on it and what research there is heavily depends on offending pedophiles as subjects. Pedophiles who don’t offend rarely take part in studies because of the stigma around being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size. As a society when it comes to dealing with pedophiles, the goal is and should be simply the reduction of harm to children. In other words, the goal should be whatever it takes so that less children are abused. If you look at it from that perspective, the answer when it comes to sex dolls that look like prepubescent children, is that if in the end it reduces harm to actual children, we should allow them. As for whether or not they actually reduce harm to children, we simply don’t have enough data to say one way or the other. Evidence seems to suggest that it does make a pedophile less likely to offend if they have access to some kind of way to relieve themselves sexually like with a doll. There isn’t any evidence to suggest any kind of escalation of activity like using a doll would make someone more likely to abuse children. Similar to how massive amounts of evidence shows that people who play violent video games are actually less likely to be violent in real life and as porn use goes up people are less likely to commit sexual assault, we can extrapolate that people are less likely to act on their urges with a real child if they have some kind of ethical outlet. The main way the pedophiles who do offend actually end up offending is by viewing and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is wrong as well because you need to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn't abuse children would make all of those pedophiles that fall into the trap of child pornography less likely to actually do that. This leads us to the logical conclusion as well, where if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would that be allowed as well? As animation gets better, this might someday be possible. These are thorny ethical issues that must be addressed. The idea of someone using a sex doll that looks like a child and watching animated porn of people having sex with children Is repulsive (and personally triggering to me). However, we have to remember that we have a goal in mind here and that goal is: fewer children molested and harmed. So if something that bothers and disgusts us but doesn't hurt any children will make it so that less actual children are harmed, I’m all for it. So in terms of whether or not they should be illegal I am leaning towards no. They should be allowed and we should do more scientific studies to make sure they actually do what we hope they do: make pedophiles less likely to offend. I would probably be in favor of them being prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that, who would monitor the person using them and make sure they weren’t going to hurt a real child. However, this is outside of my wheelhouse. Do they encourage and normalize a cultural climate that condones child molestation and pedophila? Why or why not? There is no slippery slope here. This has been brought up in countless other industries. Do movies and games that show violence condone real violence? All evidence points to no. In fact, healthy humans are able to separate fantasy from reality and that’s why we are able to enjoy fantastical things that we would never condone in reality. There is strong evidence to suggest that having these fantasies prevents people from doing immoral things in real life. This is why rape fantasies are okay, but real rape isn’t. It goes on and on. As far as normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it in that we need to recognize that pedophilia or people who are pedophiles are normal and that they exist. We need to normalize their sexuality and help them not act on it. This is very important. Normalizing sexual abuse of children is not something we should ever do (and again, no evidence to suggest that child sex dolls do that). Normalizing pedophiles acknowledging their attractions and getting help to prevent them from hurting children is something we need to do. Summary: As someone who has been sexually abused as a child, I am willing to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. If that means sanctioning and providing child s
(93 People Likes) Which kind of clothes are suitable for sex dolls?
r may contain sensitive images. Click on an image to unblur it. Some Manufacturing company with delivery the clothing on or with the sex doll. If you don’t have clothes for the sex doll then try to dress the sex doll sexy or your style or dress it on how you feel the doll look like. Try to do clothes that come off easy so when you have sex with the doll again it is easy for you to take it off and do your pleasure with
(80 People Likes) What should you do if you get attacked by a shark? Can you do anything to defend yourself?
o get hurt so it may back off. I’ve seen studies where scientists in a boat towing an inflatable doll that made swimming motions would see if the shark (already spotted, of course) would attack the doll while swimming. It didn’t. As soon as they stopped the boat and turned off the dolls movements, the shark did attack. It’s not absolute proof but it’s a possibility to think about. Sharks are scavengers and if it’s already dead, or appears so, that’s the best for them. If you can get it to b Best Sex Dolls ck off for a bit, start moving toward the shore and get people’s attention. That way, as more people get in the water and all sorts of hubbub starts, the shark is likely to give up, and additionally, beachgoers can summon medical help for you faster. Of course, there are all kinds of variable and all sharks are different. The best way to protect yourself is to stay o
(85 People Likes) Who is your least favorite comic book artist?
sthetics. I would not have guessed Frank Miller coming up so often. I’m a fan of his compositions, use of light and dark and hard-to-predict brushwork, though I can see depicting cherished favor people having sex with blow up dolls tes as decaying cartoons rubbing people the wrong way. Least favorite is tough to pin since I’ll usually pass on a comic book if I don’t like the art style. But I do recall the first time noticing artwork radiating so much tastelessness that the idea of someone even catching me look at it gave me a miniature panic attack. With all due respect to differing opinions and the artist toward whom I bear no ill will, I submit J. Scott Campbell. Now, I have no beef with erotic art: a natural, inevitable expression of human pleasure. Hyper-sexualized depictions of women monopolizing a media niche is of course not good, but I chose to blame industry leadership rather than the hard-toiling artists that bring us our requested filth. Nor would I dispute that attractiveness is largely governed by symmetry and preferences for familiar bodily features drawn from one’s life history. I don’t even object to the intellectual project of depicting a woman as a carefully constructed Frankenstein of Vivid Video’s class of 1993. But where you loose me is when you start slapping different wigs and coats of paint on this horrible creature, especially in the same book. Why? Because the relative lack of risk-taking reads like he’s trying too hard to succeed, and, for my tastes, good art should impress without looking like it’s trying Love Doll - another aspect I like about Frank Miller’s art. This is even more true of erotically-tinged comic books, because, and it saddens me to type this, trying too hard means trying too hard to mass produce teenage boners. While not actually ignoble, and doing so without considerable effort is a lie, it